AI SoloHR supports HR operations. It does not replace professional judgment.
This page explains the boundary between AI SoloHR workflow support and the responsibilities that remain with your organization, HR team, legal counsel, benefits advisors, and other qualified professionals.
Plain-English disclaimer
AI SoloHR is a software product for workflow management, documentation support, reminders, audit trails, and human-reviewed drafts. It is not a law firm, medical provider, benefits administrator, payroll provider, or government agency.
Use it for
Better structure, visibility, documentation, and reviewed communication.
Do not use it as
A substitute for legal, medical, compliance, or employment decision advice.
What AI SoloHR can help with
Organizing HR cases, documents, tasks, deadlines, and internal notes
Generating editable HR communication drafts for human review
Maintaining workflow history, audit logs, and exportable records
What AI SoloHR does not provide
Legal advice, attorney-client relationship, or legal representation
Medical advice, diagnosis, or independent medical judgment
Automatic FMLA, ADA, leave, accommodation, discipline, or termination decisions
A guarantee that your organization complies with federal, state, or local laws
Human review required
Sensitive HR decisions should stay with qualified humans.
AI drafts, workflow reminders, compliance guidance, and case templates should be reviewed against your actual facts, policies, state/local obligations, collective bargaining agreements, benefits plans, and counsel or advisor input where appropriate.
High-risk leave, accommodation, retaliation, discipline, or termination scenarios
Conflicting federal, state, local, union, handbook, or policy obligations
Medical documentation, disability accommodation, or interactive-process uncertainty
Any communication that could become part of a charge, investigation, demand letter, or litigation record
How to use AI SoloHR responsibly
Keep your case record factual, review AI-generated text before use, document why sensitive actions were taken, limit access to people with a legitimate HR need, and escalate uncertainty before sending or closing high-risk cases.